HAMRICK v. ALABAMA 389 U.S. 10 (1967)

United States Supreme Court

HAMRICK v. ALABAMA (1967)

No. 345

Decided: October 09, 1967

281 Ala. 150, 199 So.2d 849, appeal dismissed.

William B. McCollough, Jr., for appellant.

MacDonald Gallion, Attorney General of Alabama, and Robert P. Bradley and Walter S. Turner, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

SMITH v. ARIZONA, <flCite id="/us-supreme-court/389/10#">389 U.S. 10 </flCite> (1967) 389 U.S. 10 (1967) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

SMITH v. ARIZONA, 389 U.S. 10 (1967)

389 U.S. 10

SMITH v. ARIZONA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA.
No. 26, Misc.
Decided October 9, 1967.

Certiorari granted; 98 Ariz. 45, 401 P.2d 739, vacated and remanded.

Darrell F. Smith, Attorney General of Arizona, and Carl Waag, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Arizona in light of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 .

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE STEWART dissent. [389 U.S. 10, 11]

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network