FRIEDMAN v. NEW YORK 388 U.S. 441 (1967)

United States Supreme Court

FRIEDMAN v. NEW YORK (1967)

No. 7

Decided: June 12, 1967

Certiorari granted; reversed.

Ira H. Holley and Eugene Gressman for petitioner.

Frank S. Hogan for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department, is reversed. Redrup v. New York, 386 U.S. 767 .

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN adheres to the views expressed in his separate opinions in Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476, 496 , and Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U.S. 413, 455 , and on the basis of the reasoning set forth therein would affirm. [388 U.S. 441, 442]

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network