MICHAEL v. CALIFORNIA(1967)
Petitioner pro se.
Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and Robert P. Samoian, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case remanded for further consideration in light of Chapman v. California, ante, p. 18.
MR. JUSTICE STEWART would grant certiorari and reverse the judgment for the reasons stated in his opinion concurring in the result in Chapman v. California, ante, at 42. [386 U.S. 283, 284]
Was this helpful?