SPROWAL v. NEW YORK 385 U.S. 649 (1967)

United States Supreme Court

SPROWAL v. NEW YORK (1967)

No. 825

Decided: January 23, 1967

Appeal dismissed.

Carl Rachlin for appellant.

Frank S. Hogan for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. [385 U.S. 649, 650]

FEIN v. NEW YORK, <flCite id="/us-supreme-court/385/649#">385 U.S. 649 </flCite> (1967) 385 U.S. 649 (1967) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

FEIN v. NEW YORK, 385 U.S. 649 (1967)

385 U.S. 649

FEIN v. NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 793.
Decided January 23, 1967.

18 N. Y. 2d 162, 219 N. E. 2d 274, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Louis Nizer, Paul Martinson and Bennett Boskey for appellant.

Frank S. Hogan for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network