FLOYD & BEASLEY TRANSFER CO., INC. v. UNITED STATES 385 U.S. 647 (1967)

United States Supreme Court

FLOYD & BEASLEY TRANSFER CO., INC. v. UNITED STATES (1967)

No. 702

Decided: January 23, 1967

256 F. Supp. 23, affirmed.

John W. Cooper for appellant.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane and Fritz R. Kahn for the United States et al.; Guy H. Postell for Akers Motor Lines, Inc., et al.; and Harold Hernly, Robert E. Joyner and Ormond Somerville for Alabama Highway Express, Inc., et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

SOUTHERN PACIFIC CO. v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, <flCite id="/us-supreme-court/385/647#">385 U.S. 647 </flCite> (1967) 385 U.S. 647 (1967) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

SOUTHERN PACIFIC CO. v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, 385 U.S. 647 (1967)

385 U.S. 647

SOUTHERN PACIFIC CO. v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE
DISTRICT. No. 797.
Decided January 23, 1967.

242 Cal. App. 2d 38, 51 Cal. Rptr. 197, appeal dismissed.

Randolph Karr and Alan L. Freedman for appellant.

Roger Arnebergh and Bourke Jones for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [385 U.S. 647, 648]

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law