EXLEY EXPRESS, INC. v. UNITED STATES 385 U.S. 371 (1966)

United States Supreme Court

EXLEY EXPRESS, INC. v. UNITED STATES (1966)

No. 644

Decided: December 12, 1966

Affirmed.

Robert L. Holtzclaw and James T. Johnson for appellant.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States et al.; Earle V. White for Albany Food Products, Inc., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

LAIRD & CO. v. CHENEY, <flCite id="/us-supreme-court/385/371#">385 U.S. 371 </flCite> (1966) 385 U.S. 371 (1966) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

LAIRD & CO. v. CHENEY, 385 U.S. 371 (1966)

385 U.S. 371

LAIRD & CO. ET AL. v. CHENEY, DIRECTOR OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL,
ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF KANSAS. No. 675.
Decided December 12, 1966.

196 Kan. 675, 414 P.2d 18, appeal dismissed.

Harry W. Colmery and Robert E. Russell for appellants.

Robert C. Londerholm, Attorney General of Kansas, and Park McGee, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [385 U.S. 371, 372]

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network