BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD CO. v. UNITED STATES 385 U.S. 3 (1966)

United States Supreme Court

BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD CO. v. UNITED STATES (1966)

No. 104

Decided: October 10, 1966

249 F. Supp. 712, affirmed.

Samuel P. Delisi and Edward A. Kaier for appellants.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Charles L. Marinaccio and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States et al. James M. Carter for appellee Erie-Lackawanna Railroad Co.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

BUCHANAN v. RHODES, GOVERNOR OF OHIO, <flCite id="/us-supreme-court/385/3#">385 U.S. 3 </flCite> (1966) 385 U.S. 3 (1966) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

BUCHANAN v. RHODES, GOVERNOR OF OHIO, 385 U.S. 3 (1966)

385 U.S. 3

BUCHANAN ET AL. v. RHODES, GOVERNOR OF OHIO, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN
DISTRICT OF OHIO. No. 115.
Decided October 10, 1966.

249 F. Supp. 860, appeal dismissed.

Richard M. Markus for appellants.

William B. Saxbe, Attorney General of Ohio, and Gerald A. Donahue, First Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. [385 U.S. 3, 4]

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law