BOYDEN v. MAY 385 U.S. 15 (1966)

United States Supreme Court

BOYDEN v. MAY (1966)

No. 351

Decided: October 10, 1966

Appeal dismissed.

Appellant pro se.

Solicitor General Marshall for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

BRADFORD v. HELMAN, <flCite id="/us-supreme-court/385/15#">385 U.S. 15 </flCite> (1966) 385 U.S. 15 (1966) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

BRADFORD v. HELMAN, 385 U.S. 15 (1966)

385 U.S. 15

BRADFORD v. HELMAN, JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE
OF NEW YORK, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK. No. 389, Misc.
Decided October 10, 1966.

Appeal dismissed.

Appellant pro se.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Brenda Soloff, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [385 U.S. 15, 16]

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law