CAPELOUTO v. ORKIN EXTERMINATING CO. 385 U.S. 11 (1966)

United States Supreme Court

CAPELOUTO v. ORKIN EXTERMINATING CO. (1966)

No. 316

Decided: October 10, 1966

183 So.2d 532, appeal dismissed.

Wilfred C. Varn for appellant.

J. Lewis Hall for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MASLOWSKY v. CASSIDY, <flCite id="/us-supreme-court/385/11#">385 U.S. 11 </flCite> (1966) 385 U.S. 11 (1966) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

MASLOWSKY v. CASSIDY, 385 U.S. 11 (1966)

385 U.S. 11

MASLOWSKY ET AL. v. CASSIDY, CHAIRMAN, ILLINOIS HOUSE OF
REPRESENTATIVES COMMISSION, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS. No. 574.
Decided October 10, 1966.

34 Ill. 2d 456, 216 N. E. 2d 669, appeal dismissed.

Albert E. Jenner, Jr., and Thomas P. Sullivan for appellants.

Owen Rall for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented federal question.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. [385 U.S. 11, 12]

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network