MILLER v. VIRGINIA 383 U.S. 831 (1966)

United States Supreme Court

MILLER v. VIRGINIA (1966)

No. 196

Decided: April 04, 1966

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Appellant pro se.

Reno S. Harp III, Assistant Attorney General of Virginia, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that in treating the papers as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari should be granted.

DRUM v. SEAWELL, <flCite id="/us-supreme-court/383/831#">383 U.S. 831 </flCite> (1966) 383 U.S. 831 (1966) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

DRUM v. SEAWELL, 383 U.S. 831 (1966)

383 U.S. 831

DRUM ET AL. v. SEAWELL, CHAIRMAN OF THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE
BOARD OF ELECTIONS, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. 1128.
Decided April 4, 1966.

249 F. Supp. 877, affirmed.

Louis Rabil and Robinson O. Everett for appellants.

T. Wade Bruton, Attorney General of North Carolina, James F. Bullock, Assistant Attorney General, and Thomas L. Young for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to advance and expedite consideration is granted. The judgment is affirmed. [383 U.S. 831, 832]

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law