CIESIELSKI v. OHIO 383 U.S. 411 (1966)

United States Supreme Court

CIESIELSKI v. OHIO (1966)

No. 920

Decided: March 07, 1966

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Theodore R. Saker for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. [383 U.S. 411, 412]

UNITED TRANSPORTS, INC. v. UNITED STATES, <flCite id="/us-supreme-court/383/411#">383 U.S. 411 </flCite> (1966) 383 U.S. 411 (1966) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

UNITED TRANSPORTS, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 383 U.S. 411 (1966)

383 U.S. 411

UNITED TRANSPORTS, INC., ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF
OKLAHOMA. No. 868.
Decided March 7, 1966.

245 F. Supp. 561, 570, affirmed.

James W. Wrape, Robert E. Joyner and Reagan Sayers for appellants.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane and Robert S. Burk for the United States et al.; Paul F. Sullivan for Kenosha Auto Transport Corp., and Donald W. Smith for Commercial Carriers, Inc., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgments are affirmed.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network