HC&D MOVING & STORAGE CO., INC., v. YAMANE 383 U.S. 104 (1966)

United States Supreme Court

HC&D MOVING & STORAGE CO., INC., v. YAMANE (1966)

No. 855

Decided: February 21, 1966

48 Haw. 486, 405 P.2d 382, appeal dismissed.

J. Garner Anthony for appellants.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [383 U.S. 104, 105]

NOLAN v. RHODES, <flCite id="/us-supreme-court/383/104#">383 U.S. 104 </flCite> (1966) 383 U.S. 104 (1966) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

NOLAN v. RHODES, 383 U.S. 104 (1966)

383 U.S. 104

NOLAN v. RHODES, GOVERNOR OF OHIO, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN
DISTRICT OF OHIO. No. 836.
Decided February 21, 1966.

251 F. Supp. 584, affirmed.

Kenneth G. Weinberg and Stewart R. Jaffy for appellant.

William B. Saxbe, Attorney General of Ohio, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law