ATLANTIC GULF & PACIFIC CO. v. GEROSA 382 U.S. 368 (1966)

United States Supreme Court

ATLANTIC GULF & PACIFIC CO. v. GEROSA (1966)

No. 718

Decided: January 17, 1966

16 N. Y. 2d 1, 209 N. E. 2d 86, appeal dismissed.

Richard H. Appert for appellant.

Leo A. Larkin, Stanley Buchsbaum and Samuel J. Warms for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [382 U.S. 368, 369]

PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD CO. v. UNITED STATES, <flCite id="/us-supreme-court/382/368#">382 U.S. 368 </flCite> (1966) 382 U.S. 368 (1966) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD CO. v. UNITED STATES, 382 U.S. 368 (1966)

382 U.S. 368

PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD CO. ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
PENNSYLVANIA. No. 556.
Decided January 17, 1966.

Affirmed.

Paul R. Duke and Edward A. Kaier for appellants.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Robert B. Hummel, Neil Brooks, Robert W. Ginnane and I. K. Hay for the United States et al. Leo A. Larkin, Samuel Mandell, Sidney Goldstein, F. A. Mulhern, Arthur L. Winn, Jr., Samuel H. Moerman, J. Raymond Clark and James M. Henderson for appellee Port of New York Authority.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law