KADANS v. DICKERSON 382 U.S. 22 (1965)

United States Supreme Court

KADANS v. DICKERSON (1965)

No. 399

Decided: October 11, 1965

Appeal dismissed.

Joseph M. Kadans, appellant, pro se.

Paul C. Parraguirre for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. [382 U.S. 22, 23]

MALLORY v. NORTH CAROLINA, <flCite id="/us-supreme-court/382/22#">382 U.S. 22 </flCite> (1965) 382 U.S. 22 (1965) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

MALLORY v. NORTH CAROLINA, 382 U.S. 22 (1965)

382 U.S. 22

MALLORY ET AL. v. NORTH CAROLINA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA.
No. 81, Misc.
Decided October 11, 1965.

263 N.C. 536, 139 S. E. 2d 870, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Walter S. Haffner for appellants.

T. W. Bruton, Attorney General of North Carolina, and Ralph Moody, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network