NEHRING v. GERRITY 382 U.S. 202 (1965)

United States Supreme Court

NEHRING v. GERRITY (1965)

No. 614

Decided: December 06, 1965

31 Ill. 2d 608, 203 N. E. 2d 402, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. [382 U.S. 202, 203]

CALIFORNIA DEMOCRATIC COUNCIL v. ARNEBERGH, <flCite id="/us-supreme-court/382/202#">382 U.S. 202 </flCite> (1965) 382 U.S. 202 (1965) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

CALIFORNIA DEMOCRATIC COUNCIL v. ARNEBERGH, 382 U.S. 202 (1965)

382 U.S. 202

CALIFORNIA DEMOCRATIC COUNCIL ET AL. v. ARNEBERGH ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE
DISTRICT. No. 583.
Decided December 6, 1965.

233 Cal. App. 2d 425, 43 Cal. Rptr. 531, appeal dismissed.

Leon M. Cooper for appellants.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Charles A. Barrett, Assistant Attorney General, Sanford N. Gruskin, Deputy Attorney General, Harold W. Kennedy, Roger Arnebergh, pro se, and Bourke Jones for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network