MADDOX v. WILLIS 382 U.S. 18 (1965)

United States Supreme Court

MADDOX v. WILLIS (1965)

No. 308

Decided: October 11, 1965

Appeal dismissed.

William G. McRae for appellant.

Jack Greenberg, James M. Nabrit III and Michael Meltsner for appellees Willis et al. Acting Solicitor General Spritzer, Assistant Attorney General Doar and Harold H. Greene for appellee Katzenbach.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

EL PASO ELECTRIC CO. v. CALVERT, <flCite id="/us-supreme-court/382/18#">382 U.S. 18 </flCite> (1965) 382 U.S. 18 (1965) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

EL PASO ELECTRIC CO. v. CALVERT, 382 U.S. 18 (1965)

382 U.S. 18

EL PASO ELECTRIC CO. v. CALVERT ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF TEXAS, THIRD SUPREME JUDICIAL
DISTRICT. No. 395.
Decided October 11, 1965.

385 S. W. 2d 542, appeal dismissed.

William Duncan for appellant.

Waggoner Carr, Attorney General of Texas, Hawthorne Phillips, First Assistant Attorney General, T. B. Wright, Executive Assistant Attorney General, and Gordon C. Cass and H. Grady Chandler, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [382 U.S. 18, 19]

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network