Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
383 S. W. 2d 675, appeal dismissed.
James C. Ware for appellants.
Harry L. Riggs, Jr., for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
ALUMINUM CO. OF AMERICA ET AL. v. UNITED STATES.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
MISSOURI. No. 84.
Decided October 11, 1965.
233 F. Supp. 718; 247 F. Supp. 308, affirmed.
Herbert A. Bergson, Howard Adler, Jr., Daniel H. Margolis and William K. Unverzagt for appellants.
Solicitor General Cox, Acting Assistant Attorney General Wright, Lionel Kestenbaum, Jerry Z. Pruzansky and Edna Lingreen for the United States.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. [382 U.S. 12, 13]
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Citation: 382 U.S. 12
No. 62
Decided: October 11, 1965
Court: United States Supreme Court
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)