Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Judgment of Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Third Supreme Judicial District, 386 S. W. 2d 202, vacated and remanded to that court.
Robert W. Hainsworth, appellant, pro se.
Waggoner Carr, Attorney General of Texas, and Hawthorne Phillips, Pat Bailey and Mary K. Wall, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
This cause having become moot in the light of the enactment of the Texas Apportionment Act of 1965, the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals, Third Supreme Judicial District of Texas, is vacated, and the cause is remanded for such proceedings as by that court may be deemed appropriate.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART would dismiss the appeal for want of a substantial federal question.
MR. JUSTICE FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. [382 U.S. 109, 110]
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Citation: 382 U.S. 109
No. 477
Decided: November 15, 1965
Court: United States Supreme Court
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)