CORPORA v. NEW YORK 380 U.S. 520 (1965)

United States Supreme Court

CORPORA v. NEW YORK (1965)

No. 934

Decided: April 26, 1965

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Emanuel Redfield for appellant.

Frank S. Hogan and H. Richard Uviller for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [380 U.S. 520, 521]

GOLD v. DiCARLO, <flCite id="/us-supreme-court/380/520#">380 U.S. 520 </flCite> (1965) 380 U.S. 520 (1965) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

GOLD v. DiCARLO, 380 U.S. 520 (1965)

380 U.S. 520

GOLD ET AL. v. DiCARLO, COMMISSIONER OF LICENSES OF CITY OF NEW YORK,
ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 901.
Decided April 26, 1965.

235 F. Supp. 817, affirmed.

Jesse Moss for appellants.

Leo A. Larkin and Seymour B. Quel for DiCarlo, and Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, pro se, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Lester Esterman, Assistant Attorney General, for Lefkowitz, appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law