CHICAGO & N.W. R.W. v. CHICAGO MIL. ST. PAUL & PAC. R. 380 U.S. 448 (1965)

United States Supreme Court

CHICAGO & N.W. R.W. v. CHICAGO MIL. ST. PAUL & PAC. R. (1965)

No. 21

Argued: November 17, 1964 Decided: April 05, 1965

214 F. Supp. 244, reversed.

John C. Danielson argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Jordan Jay Hillman.

Frank M. Long argued the cause for appellees. With him on the brief were Philip H. Porter, R. K. Merrill and Richard R. Robinson.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Lionel Kestenbaum, Robert W. Ginnane and Arthur Cerra filed a memorandum for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is reversed. Texas & P. R. Co. v. Gulf, C. & S. F. R. Co., 270 U.S. 266, 278 . [380 U.S. 448, 449]

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law