VOORHES v. DEMPSEY 379 U.S. 648 (1965)

United States Supreme Court

VOORHES v. DEMPSEY (1965)

No. 600

Decided: January 18, 1965

231 F. Supp. 975, affirmed.

Colin C. Tait for appellants.

Harold M. Mulvey, Attorney General of Connecticut, and Raymond J. Cannon, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

LYLES v. BETO, <flCite id="/us-supreme-court/379/648#">379 U.S. 648 </flCite> (1965) 379 U.S. 648 (1965) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

LYLES v. BETO, 379 U.S. 648 (1965)

379 U.S. 648

LYLES v. BETO, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 263, Misc.
Decided January 18, 1965.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 329 F.2d 332.

E. D. Vickery for petitioner.

Waggoner Carr, Attorney General of Texas, and Sam R. Wilson, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of Massiah v. United States, 377 U.S. 201 . [379 U.S. 648, 649]

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law