ALVAREZ v. CALIFORNIA 379 U.S. 4 (1964)

United States Supreme Court

ALVAREZ v. CALIFORNIA (1964)

No. 46

Decided: October 12, 1964

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [379 U.S. 4, 5]

ACCELERATED TRANSPORT-PONY EXPRESS, v. UNITED STATES, <flCite id="/us-supreme-court/379/4#">379 U.S. 4 </flCite> (1964) 379 U.S. 4 (1964) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

ACCELERATED TRANSPORT-PONY EXPRESS, v. UNITED STATES, 379 U.S. 4 (1964)

379 U.S. 4

ACCELERATED TRANSPORT-PONY EXPRESS, INC., ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF VERMONT.
No. 131.
Decided October 12, 1964.

227 F. Supp. 815, affirmed.

Bryce Rea, Jr., and Louis Lisman for appellants.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Robert B. Hummel, Robert W. Ginnane and Betty Jo Christian for the United States et al.; W. G. Burnette for Lynchburg Traffic Bureau; Arthur A. Arsham and John J. C. Martin for National Small Shipments Traffic Conference, Inc., et al.; and John M. Cleary, John F. Donelan and Dickson R. Loos for National Industrial Traffic League, appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law