DENMAN v. WHITE 379 U.S. 28 (1964)

United States Supreme Court

DENMAN v. WHITE (1964)

No. 379

Decided: November 09, 1964

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed. [379 U.S. 28, 29]

TRAUTWEIN v. COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, LOS ANGELES, <flCite id="/us-supreme-court/379/28#">379 U.S. 28 </flCite> (1964) 379 U.S. 28 (1964) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

TRAUTWEIN v. COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, LOS ANGELES, 379 U.S. 28 (1964)

379 U.S. 28

TRAUTWEIN ET AL. v. COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF LOS ANGELES.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 416.
Decided November 9, 1964. *

[ Footnote * ] Together with No. 426, Goldman et ux. v. Community Redevelopment Agency of Los Angeles, also on appeal from the same court.

Appeals dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 61 Cal. 2d 21, 389 P.2d 538.

Frank Wickhem for appellants in No. 416.

Appellants pro se in No. 426.

Henry O. Duque for appellee in both cases.

Austin Clapp for John Swigart et al., as amici curiae, in support of appellants in No. 426.

PER CURIAM.

The motion of John Swigart et al., for leave to file a brief as amici curiae in No. 426 is granted. The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeals are dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeals were taken as petitions for writs of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network