DIXIE FEED & SEED CO., v. BYRD 379 U.S. 15 (1964)

United States Supreme Court

DIXIE FEED & SEED CO., v. BYRD (1964)

No. 311

Decided: October 19, 1964

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: ___ Tenn. App. ___, 376 S. W. 2d 745.

W. Neil Thomas, Jr., for appellants.

H. Keith Harber for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

BOINEAU v. THORNTON, <flCite id="/us-supreme-court/379/15#">379 U.S. 15 </flCite> (1964) 379 U.S. 15 (1964) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

BOINEAU v. THORNTON, 379 U.S. 15 (1964)

379 U.S. 15

BOINEAU ET AL. v. THORNTON, SECRETARY OF STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
SOUTH CAROLINA. No. 483.
Decided October 19, 1964.

235 F. Supp. 175, affirmed.

Ralph E. Becker for appellants.

Daniel R. McLeod, Attorney General of South Carolina, and Clarence T. Goolsby, Jr., and Everett N. Brandon, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. [379 U.S. 15, 16]

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law