Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
218 F. Supp. 133; 223 F. Supp. 835, affirmed.
[ Footnote * ] Together with No. 977, Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. Jones Motor Co., Inc., also on appeal from the same court.
Robert H. Young and William E. Zeiter for appellants in No. 900.
William A. Goichman, Edward Munce and Joseph C. Bruno for appellant in No. 977.
Roland Rice and Christian V. Graf for appellee.
Solicitor General Cox and Robert W. Ginnane filed a memorandum for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission in both cases.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE GOLDBERG are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. [377 U.S. 217, 218]
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Citation: 377 U.S. 217
Docket No: No. 900
Decided: May 18, 1964
Court: United States Supreme Court
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)