VOKES v. CITY OF CHICAGO, 377 U.S. 124 (1964)

United States Supreme Court

VOKES v. CITY OF CHICAGO(1964)

No. 855

Decided: April 20, 1964

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 28 Ill. 2d 475, 193 N. E. 2d 40.

Charles A. Bellows for appellants.

John C. Melaniphy, Sydney R. Drebin and Robert J. Collins for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [377 U.S. 124, 125]

378 REALTY CORP. v. NEW YORK RENT & REHAB. ADMIN., <flCite id="/us-supreme-court/377/124#">377 U.S. 124 </flCite> (1964) 377 U.S. 124 (1964) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

378 REALTY CORP. v. NEW YORK RENT & REHAB. ADMIN., 377 U.S. 124 (1964)

377 U.S. 124
378 REALTY CORP. ET AL. v. NEW YORK CITY RENT AND REHABILITATION
ADMINISTRATION ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK. No. 845.
Decided April 20, 1964.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 13 N. Y. 2d 902, 193 N. E. 2d 510.

Harris L. Present and Irving S. Freedman for appellants.

Beatrice Shainswit for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law