METROMEDIA, INC. v. CITY OF PASADENA 376 U.S. 186 (1964)

United States Supreme Court

METROMEDIA, INC. v. CITY OF PASADENA (1964)

No. 659

Decided: February 17, 1964

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 216 Cal. App. 2d 270, 30 Cal. Rptr. 731.

Charles Seligson, William French Smith and Paul E. Iverson for appellants.

Charles S. Rhyne for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

ARLAN'S DEPARTMENT STORE OF LOUISVILLE v. KENTUCKY, <flCite id="/us-supreme-court/376/186#">376 U.S. 186 </flCite> (1964) 376 U.S. 186 (1964) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

ARLAN'S DEPARTMENT STORE OF LOUISVILLE v. KENTUCKY, 376 U.S. 186 (1964)

376 U.S. 186

ARLAN'S DEPARTMENT STORE OF LOUISVILLE, INC., v. KENTUCKY.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY.
No. 665.
Decided February 17, 1964.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 369 S. W. 2d 9.

James E. Thornberry for appellant.

Robert Matthews, Attorney General of Kentucky, and Robert L. Montague III and Holland N. McTyeire, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [376 U.S. 186, 187]

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law