RAPOPORT v. OHIO 375 U.S. 6 (1963)

United States Supreme Court

RAPOPORT v. OHIO (1963)

No. 212

Decided: October 14, 1963

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 174 Ohio St. 134, 186 N. E. 2d 840.

Bernard R. Hollander for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [375 U.S. 6, 7]

HENRY v. CITY OF ROCK HILL, <flCite id="/us-supreme-court/375/6#">375 U.S. 6 </flCite> (1963) 375 U.S. 6 (1963) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

HENRY v. CITY OF ROCK HILL, 375 U.S. 6 (1963)

375 U.S. 6

HENRY ET AL. v. CITY OF ROCK HILL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH CAROLINA.
No. 97.
Decided October 14, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 241 S. C. 427, 128 S.E. 2d 775.

Jack Greenberg, Constance Baker Motley, Matthew J. Perry, Lincoln C. Jenkins, Jr., Donald James Sampson and Willie T. Smith, Jr. for petitioners.

Daniel R. McLeod, Attorney General of South Carolina, and Everett N. Brandon, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of South Carolina for further consideration in light of Edwards v. South Carolina, 372 U.S. 229 .

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network