DAVIS v. CITY OF BOWLING GREEN, 375 U.S. 43 (1963)

United States Supreme Court

DAVIS v. CITY OF BOWLING GREEN(1963)

No. 331

Decided: October 21, 1963

Judgment affirmed.

Albert O. Scafuro for appellants.

Squire R. Ogden for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. [375 U.S. 43, 44]

HUMBLE OIL & REFINING CO. v. MALE, <flCite id="/us-supreme-court/375/43#">375 U.S. 43 </flCite> (1963) 375 U.S. 43 (1963) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

HUMBLE OIL & REFINING CO. v. MALE, 375 U.S. 43 (1963)

375 U.S. 43
HUMBLE OIL & REFINING CO. ET AL. v. MALE, COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT
OF LABOR & INDUSTRY, NEW JERSEY.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY. No. 326.
Decided October 21, 1963.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

T. Girard Wharton and John W. Fritz for appellants.

Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, and Theodore I. Botter, First Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law