FAUDEL v. IOWA 375 U.S. 397 (1964)

United States Supreme Court

FAUDEL v. IOWA (1964)

No. 123

Decided: January 06, 1964

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Appellant pro se.

Evan Hultman, Attorney General of Iowa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

WATKINS v. BETO, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR, <flCite id="/us-supreme-court/375/397#">375 U.S. 397 </flCite> (1964) 375 U.S. 397 (1964) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

WATKINS v. BETO, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR, 375 U.S. 397 (1964)

375 U.S. 397

WATKINS v. BETO, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR, ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF
TEXAS. No. 417, Misc.
Decided January 6, 1964.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Petitioner pro se.

Waggoner Carr, Attorney General of Texas, and Howard Fender, Gilbert J. Pena and Allo B. Crow, Jr., Assistant Attorneys General, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Criminal Appeals for consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353 ; Draper v. Washington, 372 U.S. 487 . [375 U.S. 397, 398]

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law