RATIGAN v. DAVIS, 375 U.S. 394 (1964)

United States Supreme Court

RATIGAN v. DAVIS(1964)

No. 547

Decided: January 06, 1964

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 175 Neb. 416, 122 N. W. 2d 12.

Benjamin M. Wall for appellants.

William R. King and Seymour L. Smith for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

SPATT v. CITY OF NEW YORK, <flCite id="/us-supreme-court/375/394#">375 U.S. 394 </flCite> (1964) 375 U.S. 394 (1964) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

SPATT v. CITY OF NEW YORK, 375 U.S. 394 (1964)

375 U.S. 394
SPATT v. CITY OF NEW YORK ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 562.
Decided January 6, 1964.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 13 N. Y. 2d 618, 191 N. E. 2d 91.

Charles E. Bernstein for appellant.

Leo A. Larkin, Stanley Buchsbaum and Solomon Portnow for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [375 U.S. 394, 395]

Was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law