CEPERO v. PELOSO 375 U.S. 16 (1963)

United States Supreme Court

CEPERO v. PELOSO (1963)

No. 116

Decided: October 14, 1963

Appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Appellant pro se.

Solicitor General Cox for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. [375 U.S. 16, 17]

REATZ v. NEW YORK, <flCite id="/us-supreme-court/375/16#">375 U.S. 16 </flCite> (1963) 375 U.S. 16 (1963) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

REATZ v. NEW YORK, 375 U.S. 16 (1963)

375 U.S. 16

REATZ v. NEW YORK.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE APPELLATE DIVISION, SUPREME COURT
OF NEW YORK, SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT. No. 50, Misc.
Decided October 14, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Petitioner pro se.

William I. Siegel for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Judicial Department, for further consideration in light of Griffin v. Illinois, 351 U.S. 12 , Eskridge v. Washington Prison Board, 357 U.S. 214 , and Norvell v. Illinois, 373 U.S. 420 .

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network