FRIEDMAN v. COURT ON THE JUDICIARY, 375 U.S. 10 (1963)

United States Supreme Court

FRIEDMAN v. COURT ON THE JUDICIARY(1963)

No. 285

Decided: October 14, 1963

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Theodore Kiendl and Raphael H. Weissman for appellant.

John R. Davison and William R. Brennan for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

LOUISIANA v. JEANSONNE, <flCite id="/us-supreme-court/375/10#">375 U.S. 10 </flCite> (1963) 375 U.S. 10 (1963) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

LOUISIANA v. JEANSONNE, 375 U.S. 10 (1963)

375 U.S. 10
LOUISIANA EX REL. SCHWEGMANN BANK & TRUST CO. ET AL. v. JEANSONNE,
STATE BANK COMMISSIONER.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, FIRST CIRCUIT. No. 311.
Decided October 14, 1963.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 144 So.2d 159.

Charles A. O'Niell, Jr. for appellants.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. [375 U.S. 10, 11]

Was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law