PAIGE v. NORTH CAROLINA, 374 U.S. 491 (1963)

United States Supreme Court

PAIGE v. NORTH CAROLINA(1963)

No. 884

Decided: June 17, 1963

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Petitioner pro se.

Thomas Wade Bruton, Attorney General of North Carolina, and Ralph Moody, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 .

ACUFF v. TEXAS, <flCite id="/us-supreme-court/374/491#">374 U.S. 491 </flCite> (1963) 374 U.S. 491 (1963) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

ACUFF v. TEXAS, 374 U.S. 491 (1963)

374 U.S. 491
ACUFF v. TEXAS.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS.
No. 1348, Misc.
Decided June 17, 1963.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 172 Tex. Cr. R. 176, 354 S. W. 2d 939.

Appellant pro se.

Waggoner Carr, Attorney General of Texas, and Sam R. Wilson, Linward Shivers, Allo B. Crow, Jr. and Gilbert J. Pena, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [374 U.S. 491, 492]

Was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law