Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.
Reported below: 304 F.2d 154.
Russell E. Parsons and Sol C. Berenholtz for petitioner.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller and Philip R. Monahan for the United States et al.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Southern District of California for reconsideration in light of Sanders v. United States, 373 U.S. 1 .
MR. JUSTICE CLARK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN would deny certiorari on the basis of their dissent in Sanders v. United States, 373 U.S., at 23 . [374 U.S. 101, 102]
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Citation: 374 U.S. 101
Docket No: No. 362
Decided: June 10, 1963
Court: United States Supreme Court
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)