MILNE v. RHODE ISLAND, 373 U.S. 542 (1963)

United States Supreme Court

MILNE v. RHODE ISLAND(1963)

No. 989

Decided: May 27, 1963

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: ___ R. I. ___, 187 A. 2d 136.

William M. Kunstler for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [373 U.S. 542, 543]

GONZALEZ v. CITY OF CHICAGO, <flCite id="/us-supreme-court/373/542#">373 U.S. 542 </flCite> (1963) 373 U.S. 542 (1963) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

GONZALEZ v. CITY OF CHICAGO, 373 U.S. 542 (1963)

373 U.S. 542
GONZALEZ ET AL. v. CITY OF CHICAGO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 984.
Decided May 27, 1963.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 27 Ill. 2d 128, 188 N. E. 2d 489.

Frederic D. Houghteling, George W. Overton, F. Raymond Marks, Jr. and Donald Page Moore for appellants.

John C. Melaniphy, Milton P. Webster, Jr. and Albert E. Jenner, Jr. for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law