MEYERKORTH v. NEBRASKA 372 U.S. 705 (1963)

United States Supreme Court

MEYERKORTH v. NEBRASKA (1963)

No. 827

Decided: April 15, 1963

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 173 Neb. 889, 115 N. W. 2d 585.

James N. Ackerman for appellants.

Clarence A. H. Meyer, Attorney General of Nebraska, and Melvin K. Kammerlohr, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

JOHNSON v. DOWD, <flCite id="/us-supreme-court/372/705#">372 U.S. 705 </flCite> (1963) 372 U.S. 705 (1963) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

JOHNSON v. DOWD, 372 U.S. 705 (1963)

372 U.S. 705

JOHNSON v. DOWD, WARDEN.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIANA.
No. 1, Misc.
Decided April 15, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 241 Ind. 702, 170 N. E. 2d 55.

Petitioner pro se.

Edwin K. Steers, Attorney General of Indiana, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Lane v. Brown, 372 U.S. 477 . [372 U.S. 705, 706]

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network