Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 92 Ariz. 91, 373 P.2d 722.
William R. Meagher for appellant.
J. La Mar Shelley, Charles S. Rhyne, Brice W. Rhyne and Alfred J. Tighe, Jr. for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
DANIELS v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA.
No. 814.
Decided April 15, 1963.
210 F. Supp. 942, affirmed.
John W. Bonner for appellant.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Robert B. Hummel, Robert W. Ginnane and Arthur J. Cerra for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission; Newell Gough, Jr. and Edwin S. Booth for Great Northern Railway Co., appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. [372 U.S. 704, 705]
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Citation: 372 U.S. 704
Docket No: No. 803
Decided: April 15, 1963
Court: United States Supreme Court
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)