Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 11 N. Y. 2d 317, 183 N. E. 2d 670.
Vito F. Lanza, pro se, and Samuel Shapiro for appellants.
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Irving Galt, Assistant Solicitor General, Sheldon Raab, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Leo A. Larkin and Seymour B. Quel for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [371 U.S. 74, 75]
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Citation: 371 U.S. 74
No. 452
Decided: November 13, 1962
Court: United States Supreme Court
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)