CANNATA v. CITY OF NEW YORK 371 U.S. 4 (1962)

United States Supreme Court

CANNATA v. CITY OF NEW YORK (1962)

No. 163

Decided: October 08, 1962

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 11 N. Y. 2d 210, 182 N. E. 2d 395.

Raphael H. Weissman for appellants.

Leo A. Larkin and Pauline K. Berger for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE GOLDBERG took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

WAXMAN v. VIRGINIA, <flCite id="/us-supreme-court/371/4#">371 U.S. 4 </flCite> (1962) 371 U.S. 4 (1962) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

WAXMAN v. VIRGINIA, 371 U.S. 4 (1962)

371 U.S. 4

WAXMAN ET AL. v. VIRGINIA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA.
No. 274.
Decided October 8, 1962.

203 Va. 257, 123 S. E. 2d 381, reversed.

Morris P. Glushien for appellants.

Robert Y. Button, Attorney General of Virginia, and Kenneth C. Patty and D. Gardiner Tyler, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The judgments are reversed. San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon, 359 U.S. 236 .

MR. JUSTICE GOLDBERG took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. [371 U.S. 4, 5]

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law