Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Judgment reversed on the authority of Russell v. United States, 369 U.S. 749 .
Reported below: 111 U.S. App. D.C. 79, 294 F.2d 708.
David Rein argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Joseph Forer.
Bruce J. Terris argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Yeagley and Kevin T. Maroney.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is reversed. Russell v. United States, 369 U.S. 749 .
MR. JUSTICE CLARK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Russell v. United States, 369 U.S. 749, 779 , 781.
MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
MR. JUSTICE WHITE took no part in the decision of this case. [370 U.S. 288, 289]
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Citation: 370 U.S. 288
Docket No: No. 436
Argued: April 19, 1962
Decided: June 18, 1962
Court: United States Supreme Court
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)