NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD CO. v. UNITED STATES 368 U.S. 349 (1962)

United States Supreme Court

NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD CO. v. UNITED STATES (1962)

No. 482

Decided: January 08, 1962

194 F. Supp. 947, affirmed.

Robert D. Brooks and Alfred A. Green for appellant.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Lionel Kestenbaum, Elliott H. Moyer and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States et al., and Clyde B. Aitchison, John R. Turney, Frederick A. Babson, Jr. and John H. Eisenhart, Jr. for the National Freight Traffic Assn., Inc., et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

SAVE WAY NORTHERN BOULEVARD, INC. v. NEW YORK, <flCite id="/us-supreme-court/368/349#">368 U.S. 349 </flCite> (1962) 368 U.S. 349 (1962) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

SAVE WAY NORTHERN BOULEVARD, INC. v. NEW YORK, 368 U.S. 349 (1962)

368 U.S. 349

SAVE WAY NORTHERN BOULEVARD, INC., v. NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 517.
Decided January 8, 1962.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 10 N. Y. 2d 727, 748, 176 N. E. 2d 839, 177 N. E. 2d 47.

Harold H. Levin and Larry M. Lavinsky for appellant.

Leo A. Larkin and Seymour B. Quel for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [368 U.S. 349, 350]

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law