Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
274 F.2d 702, 698, affirmed by an equally divided Court.
[ Footnote * ] Together with No. 184, Young v. United States, on certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.
Frederick M. Rowe, acting under appointment by the Court,
Harold H. Greene argued the cause for respondents in both cases. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Cox, Acting Assistant Attorney General Doar and David Rubin.
PER CURIAM.
The judgments are affirmed by an equally divided Court.
MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases. [366 U.S. 761, 762]
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Citation: 366 U.S. 761
No. 180
Argued: February 27, 1961
Decided: June 05, 1961
Court: United States Supreme Court
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)