Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Appeal dismissed because the case does not arise under 28 U.S.C. 2282 and cannot be appealed directly to this Court under 28 U.S.C. 1253.
Reported below: 185 F. Supp. 306.
Mary M. Kaufman for appellant.
Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Yeagley and Kevin T. Maroney for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted. The case does not arise under 28 U.S.C. 2282, requiring the convening of a three-judge court. See I. L. G. W. U. v. Donnelly Garment Co., 304 U.S. 243 . Therefore it cannot be directly brought here for review under 28 U.S.C. 1253, and the appeal must be dismissed. Appellant is free to pursue his perfected appeal in the Court of Appeals. [365 U.S. 465, 466]
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Citation: 365 U.S. 465
Docket No: No. 500
Decided: February 27, 1961
Court: United States Supreme Court
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)