Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 147 Conn. 374, 161 A. 2d 770.
Philip Reich for appellants.
James J. O'Connell and Albert L. Coles for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
CORDAK, DOING BUSINESS AS A. B. DENTAL PLATE LABORATORY, ET AL. v. REUBEN
H. DONNELLEY CORP. ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS. No. 582.
Decided February 20, 1961.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 20 Ill. 2d 153, 169 N. E. 2d 321.
John Paul Stevens for appellants.
Owen Rall for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [365 U.S. 299, 300]
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Citation: 365 U.S. 299
Docket No: No. 580
Decided: February 20, 1961
Court: United States Supreme Court
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)