OHIO v. SHANNON 364 U.S. 337 (1960)

United States Supreme Court

OHIO v. SHANNON (1960)

No. 363

Decided: November 07, 1960

Appeal dismissed because the judgment below is based on a non-federal ground adequate to support it.

Reported below: 170 Ohio St. 393, 165 N. E. 2d 642.

Allen Brown for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal herein is dismissed for the reason that the judgment of the Supreme Court of the State of Ohio, sought here to be reviewed, is based upon a nonfederal ground adequate to support it.

ARMCO STEEL CORP. v. MICHIGAN, <flCite id="/us-supreme-court/364/337#">364 U.S. 337 </flCite> (1960) 364 U.S. 337 (1960) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

ARMCO STEEL CORP. v. MICHIGAN, 364 U.S. 337 (1960)

364 U.S. 337

ARMCO STEEL CORP. v. MICHIGAN ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MICHIGAN.
No. 387.
Decided November 7, 1960.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 359 Mich. 430, 102 N. W. 2d 552.

Paul R. Trigg, Jr. and Robert D. Dunwoodie for appellant.

Paul L. Adams, Attorney General of Michigan, Samuel J. Torina, Solicitor General, and William D. Dexter, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [364 U.S. 337, 338]

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law