DUNSCOMBE v. SAYLE 364 U.S. 289 (1960)

United States Supreme Court

DUNSCOMBE v. SAYLE (1960)

No. 163

Decided: October 10, 1960

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

John Wattawa for appellant.

C. Robert Burns for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

STATE TAX COMM. OF ARIZONA v. MURRAY CO. OF TEXAS, <flCite id="/us-supreme-court/364/289#">364 U.S. 289 </flCite> (1960) 364 U.S. 289 (1960) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

STATE TAX COMM. OF ARIZONA v. MURRAY CO. OF TEXAS, 364 U.S. 289 (1960)

364 U.S. 289

STATE TAX COMMISSION OF ARIZONA v. MURRAY COMPANY OF TEXAS, INC.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA.
No. 168.
Decided October 10, 1960.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded for clarification.

Reported below: 87 Ariz. 268, 350 P.2d 674.

Wade Church, Attorney General of Arizona, Leslie C. Hardy, Chief Assistant Attorney General, and Stanley Z. Goodfarb, Assistant Attorney General, for petitioner.

Denison Kitchel for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for clarification. Minnesota v. National Tea Co., 309 U.S. 551 .

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS dissents. [364 U.S. 289, 290]

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law