Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 31 N. J. 514, 158 A. 2d 177.
William P. Reiss for appellant.
David D. Furman, Attorney General of New Jersey, and Lee A. Holley, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee Division Against Discrimination.
Emerson L. Darnell and Sidney Reitman for appellee Willie R. James; Jerome C. Eisenberg and Herbert H. Tate for appellee Franklin D. Todd; and Julius Wildstein of counsel, and Joseph B. Robinson on the brief, for both individual appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK would note probable jurisdiction. [363 U.S. 418, 419]
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Citation: 363 U.S. 418
Docket No: No. 865
Decided: June 13, 1960
Court: United States Supreme Court
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)