Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Reported below: ___ F.2d ___.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
SIMS MOTOR TRANSPORT LINES, INC., v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
ILLINOIS. No. 823.
Decided May 23, 1960.
183 F. Supp. 113, affirmed.
Harold T. Halfpenny and Mary Shaw for appellant.
Solicitor General Rankin, Acting Assistant Attorney General Bicks, Richard A. Solomon, Henry Geller and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission.
Roland Rice and Franklin R. Overmyer for Holland Motor Express, Inc., et al.
PER CURIAM.
The motions of Holland Motor Express, Inc., et al., for leave to be named parties appellee and for leave to file a motion to affirm are granted. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Citation: 362 U.S. 637
Docket No: No. 833
Decided: May 23, 1960
Court: United States Supreme Court
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)