CERMINARO v. URBAN REDEVELOPMENT AUTH. OF PITTSBURGH, 362 U.S. 457 (1960)

United States Supreme Court

CERMINARO v. URBAN REDEVELOPMENT AUTH. OF PITTSBURGH(1960)

No. 654

Decided: April 25, 1960

Appeal dismissed.

Reported below: ___ F. Supp. ___.

Louis C. Glasso for appellant.

Theodore L. Hazlett, Jr. and David Stahl for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed.

CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. v. CITY OF EUCLID, <flCite id="/us-supreme-court/362/457#">362 U.S. 457 </flCite> (1960) 362 U.S. 457 (1960) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. v. CITY OF EUCLID, 362 U.S. 457 (1960)

362 U.S. 457
CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. v. CITY OF EUCLID, OHIO, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 740.
Decided April 25, 1960.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 170 Ohio St. 45, 162 N. E. 2d 125.

John Lansdale for appellant.

Paul H. Torbet and John F. Ray, Jr. for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [362 U.S. 457, 458]

Was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law